For some reason, SyFy has been running older horror movies, and I'm not talking Frankenstein, The Birds, or The Exorcism. Even Scream (1997) hasn't been aired that I know of, although it was the exception at the time to be an innovative horror movie with a superb surprise ending. To Wes
Craven's credit, he has always had the ability to create complex and yes, terrifying
movies over four decades. If you have any doubt, see his directorial debut of Last House on the Left. Not the remake, the original. I will never watch it again, and that's saying a lot.
I'm talking about the cheesy films that were made during the mid to late 90s that I saw when I was in high school and early college. The one showing right now is I Know What You Did Last Summer, which I remember was terribly bad the first time I saw it. It did nothing for the horror genre; it was just your predictable occasional gore-fest as defined at the time, starring pretty young things that die one by one. Even now, if you want that, watch the Final Destination series. I believe it now has five installments and the characters follow a predictable pattern in fulfilling their fate by dying in order. Go figure; I don't get the appeal there beyond basic entertainment.
On the other side, I'm not saying there's no blood or awful situations in regular horror movies, but on the opposite end of the mindless horror films, there are movies now that exist not just to horrify, but to disgust and act like Se7en on steroids amped to 300%. Think of the Hostel and Saw franchises, which were mainstream and pulling in huge box office numbers. That's disturbing in and of itself. Even Scream 4 had a nod to the fact those series are just incredibly, sickly violent with no plot (briefly known as torture porn back in the mid-2000's).
Since then, thankfully, horror has revived in many ways, particularly Guillermo del Toro and Sam Raimi's movies, and other directors who take it back to the suspense roots without being extremely graphic just for shock value. Sinister has to be one of the creepiest movies I've seen in a very long time, and I'm talking "check the bathroom, closets, and doors" creepy. I haven't seen the sequel, but the first one's response did merit respect on a very unique and disturbing premise I had never imagined.
On TV, even the X-Files is being brought back, which contained MANY very creepy episodes, but there was an ongoing link from week to week, usually a reason why this was happening. Mulder and Scully were following leads that were logical, scary, but were official investigations to some very odd situations. Freakily enough, some were drawn from others' real life experiences. While the later seasons were awful in quality, there were some early episodes that sprang from the writers' minds that were bone-chilling without being bloody.
Even Supernatural (the new TV show started in 2005) had a better first season referencing the old myths of Hook Man, Bloody Mary, and the old tropes with tongue firmly in cheek. I suspect movies like I Know What You Did Last Summer probably sparked them to really skewer these myths and show them how it should have been done in less than an hour.
What's defined as horror on a stage has always had changes, from Grand Guiguol to aspects of certain other plays, changing to the screen with the likes of Wolfman and Dracula. There seems to be an in between period post-WWII where most of the horror was already in servicemen's minds, and the subsequent fear of nuclear missiles in the 1950's/60/s like FailSafe. From there, Psycho kicked off the new era of Hitchcock's world, and a new sensibility for the wider TV audience.
In the 70's anything seemed to go. I've read the synopsis of Texas Chainsaw Massacre, and I'm frightened enough by the description I've never seen the original. The Exorcism was another one many people will never see again, although I'm ok with it. The Omen, and even the original Halloween, were breakthroughs in what the audience would and would not be able to tolerate.
The 80's brought us Freddy Kruger, Jason Voorhees, Pinhead, Chucky, and scream queen Jamie Lee Curtis (yes, I know technically it was Halloween in 1978 that brought her into the spotlight). The 90's? So far only Scream really counted for me, and that was more of an ensemble and screenplay.
Since then it's been one extreme or the other for broadcast. Completely inane random non-specific slash-fests (you see blood splattered), or such sanitized versions of regular movies (a character that mattered to the basic plot is slaughtered and the characters pretty much pretend the victim never existed); why bother? Only the truly subversive movies slip through the cracks. It's those they should broadcast, technically legally on TV, but will introduce the new generations to actual quality horror or even better, the horror-suspense genre. I can only hope a network is willing to take that chance. People and parents can change the channel if they choose.
There's a reason why those of us who appreciate the chill of a scare learn to do so. It's not for everyone at every stage in life, but for me it does thrill you when you learn to enjoy the adrenaline. We need more filmmakers who look to quality, not just repetition of a formula. More like Wes Craven, who know where and when to sucker punch you, with brutal mental manipulation. It's that creeping feeling that something terrible is happening. It's vicarious, but definitely has merit and art to frighten and expose your dark side. It's not a bad thing, at least not in my book.
I'm talking about the cheesy films that were made during the mid to late 90s that I saw when I was in high school and early college. The one showing right now is I Know What You Did Last Summer, which I remember was terribly bad the first time I saw it. It did nothing for the horror genre; it was just your predictable occasional gore-fest as defined at the time, starring pretty young things that die one by one. Even now, if you want that, watch the Final Destination series. I believe it now has five installments and the characters follow a predictable pattern in fulfilling their fate by dying in order. Go figure; I don't get the appeal there beyond basic entertainment.
On the other side, I'm not saying there's no blood or awful situations in regular horror movies, but on the opposite end of the mindless horror films, there are movies now that exist not just to horrify, but to disgust and act like Se7en on steroids amped to 300%. Think of the Hostel and Saw franchises, which were mainstream and pulling in huge box office numbers. That's disturbing in and of itself. Even Scream 4 had a nod to the fact those series are just incredibly, sickly violent with no plot (briefly known as torture porn back in the mid-2000's).
Since then, thankfully, horror has revived in many ways, particularly Guillermo del Toro and Sam Raimi's movies, and other directors who take it back to the suspense roots without being extremely graphic just for shock value. Sinister has to be one of the creepiest movies I've seen in a very long time, and I'm talking "check the bathroom, closets, and doors" creepy. I haven't seen the sequel, but the first one's response did merit respect on a very unique and disturbing premise I had never imagined.
On TV, even the X-Files is being brought back, which contained MANY very creepy episodes, but there was an ongoing link from week to week, usually a reason why this was happening. Mulder and Scully were following leads that were logical, scary, but were official investigations to some very odd situations. Freakily enough, some were drawn from others' real life experiences. While the later seasons were awful in quality, there were some early episodes that sprang from the writers' minds that were bone-chilling without being bloody.
Even Supernatural (the new TV show started in 2005) had a better first season referencing the old myths of Hook Man, Bloody Mary, and the old tropes with tongue firmly in cheek. I suspect movies like I Know What You Did Last Summer probably sparked them to really skewer these myths and show them how it should have been done in less than an hour.
What's defined as horror on a stage has always had changes, from Grand Guiguol to aspects of certain other plays, changing to the screen with the likes of Wolfman and Dracula. There seems to be an in between period post-WWII where most of the horror was already in servicemen's minds, and the subsequent fear of nuclear missiles in the 1950's/60/s like FailSafe. From there, Psycho kicked off the new era of Hitchcock's world, and a new sensibility for the wider TV audience.
In the 70's anything seemed to go. I've read the synopsis of Texas Chainsaw Massacre, and I'm frightened enough by the description I've never seen the original. The Exorcism was another one many people will never see again, although I'm ok with it. The Omen, and even the original Halloween, were breakthroughs in what the audience would and would not be able to tolerate.
The 80's brought us Freddy Kruger, Jason Voorhees, Pinhead, Chucky, and scream queen Jamie Lee Curtis (yes, I know technically it was Halloween in 1978 that brought her into the spotlight). The 90's? So far only Scream really counted for me, and that was more of an ensemble and screenplay.
Since then it's been one extreme or the other for broadcast. Completely inane random non-specific slash-fests (you see blood splattered), or such sanitized versions of regular movies (a character that mattered to the basic plot is slaughtered and the characters pretty much pretend the victim never existed); why bother? Only the truly subversive movies slip through the cracks. It's those they should broadcast, technically legally on TV, but will introduce the new generations to actual quality horror or even better, the horror-suspense genre. I can only hope a network is willing to take that chance. People and parents can change the channel if they choose.
There's a reason why those of us who appreciate the chill of a scare learn to do so. It's not for everyone at every stage in life, but for me it does thrill you when you learn to enjoy the adrenaline. We need more filmmakers who look to quality, not just repetition of a formula. More like Wes Craven, who know where and when to sucker punch you, with brutal mental manipulation. It's that creeping feeling that something terrible is happening. It's vicarious, but definitely has merit and art to frighten and expose your dark side. It's not a bad thing, at least not in my book.